When asking yourself “What’s the worst that could happen?” make sure you follow up by examining the effects of making the same type of decision repeatedly. That’s how you recognize that a free donut is not a freeroll.

Page 160 · Location 2672-2674

When a decision is hard, that means it’s easy The very thing that slows you down—having multiple options that are very close in quality—is actually a signal that you can go fast, because this tells you that whichever option you choose, you can’t possibly be that wrong, since both options have similar upside and downside potential.

Page 162 · Location 2734-2736

Because we all live in the space between no information and perfect information, it’s not realistic to think that you will be able to discern which option is better.

Page 164 · Location 2765-2766

You’re chasing an illusory certainty by taking all that extra time.

Page 164 · Location 2766-2767

That would mean that you’re spending all that time to try to resolve a .2% difference between the two options.

Page 164 · Location 2770-2771

THE ONLY-OPTION TEST For any options you’re considering, ask yourself, “If this were the only option I had, would I be happy with it?”

Page 165 · Location 2779-2781

The Menu Strategy This strategy for choosing what to order from a menu can be broadly applied to decision-making in general. For any decision, spend your time sorting the world into stuff you like and stuff you don’t like. After that, go fast.

Page 166 · Location 2796-2798

Any choice that you make has associated opportunity cost. When you choose an option, you’re also rejecting other options, along with the upside potential of those things you chose not to do. The greater the gains associated with the options you don’t pick, the higher the opportunity cost. The higher the opportunity cost, the greater the penalty for going fast.

Page 167 · Location 2815-2817

opportunity cost should be a factor in how you manage the time-accuracy trade-off.

Page 167 · Location 2824-2825

“If I pick this option, what’s the cost of quitting?”

Page 169 · Location 2850-2851

QUIT-TO-ITIVENESS The lower the cost to quit, the faster you can go, because it’s easier to unwind the decision and choose a different option, including options you may have rejected in the past.

Page 169 · Location 2855-2857

Being quit-to-itive improves decision quality.

Page 170 · Location 2867-2868

Decisions where the cost to quit is manageable also give you an opportunity to gather information through innovation and experimentation

Page 170 · Location 2868-2869

It’s hard to succeed at anything if you don’t have grit and stick-to-itiveness.

Page 170 · Location 2877-2877

DECISION STACKING Finding ways to make low-impact, easy-to-quit decisions in advance of a high-impact, harder-to-quit decision.

Page 171 · Location 2887-2889

You want to balance what you’re gaining by doing multiple things at once with what you’re losing in money, time, and other resources

Page 172 · Location 2909-2910

When should you stop analyzing and just decide?

Page 175 · Location 2951-2951

If your goal is to get to certainty about your choice, you’ll never be finished. Chasing certainty causes analysis paralysis.

Page 175 · Location 2951-2952

includes asking yourself a final question: “Is there information that I could find out that would change my mind?”

Page 175 · Location 2955-2956

continue your search? Pretty much every decision is made with incomplete information.

Page 175 · Location 2959-2959