Elicit feedback independently and share it with the group prior to meeting.

Page 230 · Location 3919-3920

people give feedback that more accurately represents their knowledge and preferences when they do it independently and privately, compared with doing it in a group.

Page 231 · Location 3923-3924

This is what eliciting initial feedback and ideas independently (by email or some other means) does. It reduces the artificial appearance of overlap in opinions, better exposing where beliefs diverge.

Page 231 · Location 3929-3931

The most contagious beliefs on a team come from higher-status individuals.

Page 231 · Location 3938-3939

in reality, ideas that come from people of lower status don’t get equal consideration on the merits.

Page 232 · Location 3942-3943

HALO EFFECT A cognitive bias in which a positive impression of a person in one area causes you to have a positive view of that person in other, unrelated, areas.

Page 232 · Location 3951-3953

there are a lot of benefits to having the first pass be anonymous.

Page 232 · Location 3950-3950

Group members with lower status may have different, valuable perspectives. Sometimes, they see innovative solutions others don’t see because they aren’t as anchored to the status quo.

Page 233 · Location 3962-3964

A good group process encourages feedback that includes giving people the space to express a lack of understanding. The group as a whole benefits from that because it affords the experts the opportunity to better understand why they believe what they do, and also affords them the opportunity to transfer their knowledge to the other members of the group. And sometimes it gives them an <You have reached the clipping limit for this item>

Page 233 · Location 3968-3971