Upstream
by Heath, Dan ¡ 132 highlights
F2F interactions plunged by about 70% in both companies. Meanwhile, email and messaging activity spiked. When people were placed closer together so that theyâd talk more, they talked less.
On one hand, you think: Of course, moving people closer together will lead them to collaborate more! Thatâs just basic sociology. On the other hand: No, look at subways or airplanesâwhen people are crammed in together, they find ways to retain some privacy through headphones or books or deeply unwelcoming glances.
âGet your model out there where it can be shot at. Invite others to challenge your assumptions and add their own âŚ. The thing to do, when you donât know, is not to bluff and not to freeze, but to learn. The way you learn is by experimentâor, as Buckminster Fuller put it, by trial and error, error, error.â
we donât succeed by foreseeing the future accurately. We succeed by ensuring that weâll have the feedback we need to navigate.
Feedback loops spur improvement. And where those loops are missing, they can be created.
as Michael Jordan said, âYou can practice shooting eight hours a day, but if your technique is wrong, then all you become is very good at shooting the wrong way.â
the complainers and the critics. The firm actually started losing CPAs
the people who dominated the conversation tended to be the complainers and the critics.
They had a facilitator run the meetings, using a new structured agenda that included a segment in which every participant shared something positive from the previous week.
Beyond the structured agenda, though, they added a feedback loop. At the end of every meeting, every attendee verbally scored the meeting from 1 to 5. Outliers were asked quickly what had made the meeting unusually helpful or unhelpful.
Beyond the structured agenda, though, they added a feedback loop. At the end of every meeting, every attendee verbally scored the meeting from 1 to 5. Outliers were asked quickly what had made the meeting unusually helpful or unhelpful. When people complained about somethingâa discussion going on too long, a problem not being resolvedâthose issues got addressed.
Can we create closed feedback loops so that we can improve quickly? Is it easy to reverse or undo our intervention if it turns out weâve unwittingly done harm?
concluded that youâd need to use a paper bag 3 times and a cotton reusable bag 131 times to be on par with plastic bags.
âper useâ effects of different bags on climate change and concluded that youâd need to use a paper bag 3 times and a cotton reusable bag 131 times to be on par with plastic bags.
âSystems canât be controlled, but they can be designed and redesigned.
We canât surge forward with certainty into a world of no surprises, but we can expect surprises and learn from them and even profit from them
âIn public health, if you do your job, they cut your budget, because no one is getting sick,â
Preventive efforts succeed when nothing happens. Who will pay for what does not happen?
Where are there costly problems? Who is in the best position to prevent those problems? And, how do you create incentives for them to do so?
how to find someone whoâll pay for prevention.